MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Language  |  Help  
 
BC2LCCBC2LCC@groups.msn.com 
  
What's New
  Join Now
  Messages  
  Pictures  
  Calendar  
  Documents  
  Links  
  9449 is Composite  
  9559 is composite  
  9779 is composite  
  Base conversion  
  Pari util.gp  
  Digital Roots  
  Quartic Equ  
  3n^2 -1 not sq  
  3n^2+2 not sq  
  8 divides n^2-1  
  a^n(p-1)-b^n(p-1)  
  x^n+y^n=z^(n+1)  
  5^n + 3 <> 2^m  
  a^2 + b^2 = c^2  
  2^m+1 not prime  
  xdivmxp-r  
  y^2 = px^2 +1  
  8 divides (8x+3)^m + (8y+5)^n  
  2 divides (8x+3)^m+(8*y+5)^n  
  (8x+3)^m + (8y+5)^m<> z^m  
  3^x+5^x - 2 = 11k  
  2^x+5^x - 5 = 7k  
  Number Investigations  
  N^3 + 7 <> K^2  
  n^3 + 4m+3 != k^2  
  N + Reciprocal Recursion  
  Pythag Triples  
  Cont Frac  
  Irrationality proofs  
  (p+1)^p +- p^p  
  Primes of form 4k+3,6k+5,3k+2  
  z-y odd primes divides z+y iff z=y+2  
  Area of Triangle  
  x^(p-1) - y^(p-1) == 0 mod p  
  p^(p+k) + k == 0 mod p+k  
  6 divides n(n+1)(2n+1)  
  2^q + q is prime => 3 div q  
  3n^2+1 = 3x^2  
  x^3 + y^3 = z^4  
  Cubic Equation  
  Prime-Index-Primes  
  Think Clear Puzzle  
  (3^n+1)/2 is prime  
  Primes of form (a^n+b^n)/2  
  Pari Util1  
  Pari Util2  
  Fermat Numbers of order m  
  
  
  Tools  
 

                                      Proofs of divisibiliy of Fermat numbers of order m
                                                       Cino Hilliard  07/07/07

A Fermat number F(n) is a number that is 2 raised to a power of 2 + 1 = 2^(2^n) + 1.

A Fermat number of order m is a  number that is 2 raised to a power of 2 + m = 2^(2^n) + m.

Fermat numbers do not have special divisibility properties by a given number such as 3,7,11 etc
whileFermat numbers of order m do. For example m=3 we have 2^(2^n)+3 is always divisible
by 7 for odd values of n. Actually, Fermat numbers are Fermat numbers of order 1.

We prove this and other cases by induction making use of the following expansions where
appropriate.

Remark: The n used here is local to these expressions and is not to be confused with the n in
the theorems.

For any integers a and b, 
(1.1)   a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^(n-1) + a^(n-2)b + . . . + b^(n-1))  and
(1.2)   a^n - b^n = (a+b)(a^(n-1) + a^(n-2)b + . . . + b^(n-1))  for even n.
(1.3)   a^n + b^n = (a+b)(a^(n-1) + a^(n-2)b + . . . + b^(n-1))  for odd n.

Remark: All variables used in the theorems are local to the theorems.

Theorem  1.
If n is odd, r=3,  2^(2^n)+3 = 7h for some integer h.
Proof:
Since we are restricted to n odd, we re-write 2^(2^n)+3 = 2^(2^(2m+1))+3 = 4^(2m) + 3 =
(2)  4^(4^m) + 3.
For m = 1, this expression  is 4^4+3 = 7*37. So the statement is true for m = 1. Assume the
statement is true for some integer k and show the statement is true for k+1. So 4^(4^k) +3 = 7h
for some h. Let 4^(4^(k+1))+ 3 = h1. Now consider the difference h1 - 7h. If this difference is
a multiple of 7 then so is h1. So we have 4^(4^(k+1))+ 3 - (4^(4^k) + 3)) = 256^(4^k)-4^(4^k).
This is of the form (1.1) where n = 4^k, a = 256 and b = 4. So the difference as in (1.1), a^n-b^n
is  divisible by (a-b) = (256-4) = 252 = 7*36. This implies 4^(4^(k+1)+3 is divisible by 7. So we
hav assumed the statement was true for k and have shown it to be true for k+1. Therefore, by the 
induction hypothesis, the statement is true for all m.

Theorem  2.
If n is even, r=5,  2^(2^n)+5 = 7h for some integer h.
Proof:
Since we are restricted to n even, we re-write 2^(2^n)+5 = 2^(2^(2m))+5 = 2^(4^m) + 5.
For m = 1, this expression  is 2^4+5 = 7*3. So the statement is true for m = 1. Assume the
statement is true for some integer k and show the statement is true for k+1. So 2^(4^k) +5 = 7h
for some h.Let 2^(4^(k+1))+ 5 = h1. Now consider the difference h1 - 7h. If this difference is a
multiple of 7 then so is h1. So we have 2^(4^(k+1))+ 5 - (2^(4^k) + 5)) = 16^(4^k)-2^(4^k).
This is of the form (1.1) where n = 4^k, a = 16 and b = 2. So the difference as in (1.1), a^n-b^n
is divisible by (a-b) = (16-2) =14=7*2. This implies 2^(4^(k+1)+5 is divisible by 7. So we have
ssumed the statement was true for k and have shown it to be true for k+1. Therefore, by the
induction hypothesis, the statement is true for all m.

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
    MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Search
Feedback  |  Help  
  ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  Legal  Advertise  MSN Privacy