MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Language  |  Help  
 
McCoin UniKEF TheoryMcCoinUniKEFTheory@groups.msn.com 
  
What's New
  Join Now
  Einstein's Words  
  Drake Calculator  
  Messages  
  Longeivity Calculator  
  UniKEF THEORY  
  Summaries  
  Centrifugal Force  
  Space Calculators  
  Skeptics Page 1  
  Skeptics Page 2  
  World Time Zones  
  Ether Links  
  Inventions  
  WECS  
  Science News  
  Pictures  
  Graphics  
  Dr Dowdye Jr, ExtinctionShift Theory  
  Dr Kennington's Push Gravity  
  David Barwacz - Unification Theory  
  Ben Knowles-Unification  
  Reciprocity-John P. McNally  
  RCM Theory  
  Prof Tryon-physicist  
  Henry Lindner  
  Kevin Harkess  
  George K.  
  Tom Van Flandern  
  Guthmann  
  MSN Help  
  Links  
  Calendar  
  Chat options  
  Avatar  
  
  
  Tools  
 
RCM an Alternative to Relativity

BINGO: This work appears to support my views and opens the concepts to actual testing which should in the near future either directly confirm Relativity or cause its outright demise.

A lot of material here, particularily in the second link. It covers invariance of light, time dilation and contraction. It covers the ability to directly determine the Quasar FTL question and many other topics that I have tried to advance.

It is called RCM theory.

I post it here for two good reasons:

1 - It conforms to my own view of the invariance of light being a function of an energy gradient. That is light being produced is percieved as a function of energy of the observer to the source.

Which has provided physics with a false premis for the development of the Theory of Relativity.

2 - It proposes tests which can determine which view is valid SR or RCM.

http://renshaw.teleinc.com/papers/german1/german1.doc



Antimated illustrations of functions of Relativity and RCM along with test proposals.

http://renshaw.teleinc.com/



"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

 

If Einstein's second postulate is not invoked, it is a simple matter to show that Maxwell's equations are Galilean Invariant. Doppler, apparent mass increase with velocity, and other effects are explained.

I have also noticed a limitation in the wording of this second postulate.

Einstein's second postulate: "The velocity of light is constant from all inertial frames of reference."

We have had this accepted as fact with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. Yes we MEASURE light as having a constant velocity, but that could be limitations in our ability to measure and not a feature of light.

Curt Renshaw (RCM) presents a situation where the light has all possible velocities and we are only able to interact with the one that is C faster than our own.

I have considered the situation of light as moving through time rather than space, We would be moving through time at a constant velocity, "C". I prefer to visualise the universe as having places that are distant from us also offset in time. This lets light have an "infinite speed" (or simply be a ray through time) that we encounter at our speed through time, "C". This is the same thing from a reverse perspective to that of RCM but is giving me a rather similar result .

PlayTOE-

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
    MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Search
Feedback  |  Help  
  ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  Legal  Advertise  MSN Privacy