CERTIFIED MAIL NO.: Z 400 865 954
The Honorable Gerard O’Brien
Judge, Sixth Judicial Circuit
West Pasco Judicial Center
7530 Little Road
New Port Richey, FL 34654
Dear Judge O’Brien:
RE: AmSouth Bank, etc., vs. Robert F. Blevins, et al.
Case No. 99-8294CA / J3
I, Kimberly A. Blevins, am a daughter of Robert F. Blevins (March 13, 1925 - ) and Ruth E. Blevins (August 31, 1923 – January 11, 1997) and am an interested party in the above-referenced case.
The following is an update and further elaboration of my father’s letter to you, dated January 19, 2000 (Certified Mail No. Z 400 865 942).
In Item No. 1, page 1, my father stated:
AmSouth Bank joined the State of Florida, Colonial Penn Insurance Company, and all others who have, by their unlawfulness, progressively murdered my wife, and who are attempting to progressively murder me, myself. Both of us heart patients, stress, strain and mental anguish was lethal to my wife and is lethal to myself.”
Even with this strong warning, Plaintiff AmSouth Bank did not back off, and the Court offered no relief. On January 26, 2000, just one week after the Defendant, my father, mailed his January 19, 2000, letter to you, my father was admitted to the hospital and was treated for congestive heart failure – his first hospitalization for his heart problem since September, 1986. Just last week, his medication had to be doubled, having already been doubled since the initial dosage. Having attempted to murder my father simultaneously with attempting to murder my mother, they continue attempting to murder my father: the logical, medical and legal criteria are there.
In Item No. 2, page 2, my father stated:
“The Mortgage and Security Agreement submitted by Plaintiff AmSouth Bank in the above-styled cause is not a properly executed document.” The foregoing includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the fact that the notary block of the agreement includes, “…who did not take an oath and who: (notary must check applicable box)…” Yet, no box is checked. I assume “must” means “must” and that this omission, alone, renders this contract void. Heather A. Pigman, Solomon & Benedict, P.A., bear the responsibility for knowing the legal aspects and abiding by them, as well as seeing that their client does likewise. My father drew attention to this matter specifically including in his letter of January 19, 2000, Item No. 2. Petitioner AmSouth has had an obligation and an opportunity all along to mitigate consequences, yet have not only failed to mitigate the consequences, they have indeed, exacerbated them, causing immense, immeasurable, irreversible, irreparable injury to my father and his.
The foregoing is not an isolated example, but has been part and parcel of dealing with AmSouth Bank since before my mother’s death, as set forth in correspondence prior to this. I have been involved at least since April, 1999, the timeframe in which I first became involved in helping my elderly father defend against AmSouth’s first attempted foreclosure on his residential home (Ref: AmSouth Bank v. Robert E. Blevins, et al., Case No. 99-2172-CA-J2). I call into question as to whether Judge Wayne L. Cobb has implicated himself as being unlawful in this matter.
In order to take Heather A. Pigman and Solomon and Benedict, P.A., out of the loop and deal directly with Petitioner AmSouth, my father, the Defendant Robert F. Blevins, paid $7,181.85 he in no manner owed. Based on past experience in the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida (e.g. Blevins vs. Colonial Penn, CA91-6383; Laymon vs. Blevins, CA98-2771) my father has learned that his opposition, always being unlawful, wins, whereas my father Robert F. Blevins, always being lawful, loses, as was the case with my mother and father. Enclosed are copies of correspondence between my father and AmSouth Bank written and sent between May, 1999, and November, 1999.
Following his letter of November 10, 1999, the Defendant Robert F. Blevins waited for Petitioner AmSouth Bank to answer his letter and to clear up the confusion they had created. Rather than answer the letter, however, which would have been the least stress-inducing option, Petitioner AmSouth Bank instead elected to sue – a most stress-inducing course of action, and in no manner lawful, given the facts and circumstances surrounding this case.
The foregoing was followed by a mid- to late-December phone conversation I had with AmSouth’s Bob Green, wherein Mr. Green asked me what my father and I were looking for and expressed that he just wanted to get the matter off his plate, so to speak. I replied that the first thing we needed to start with was a response to my father’s letter of November 10, 1999, asking AmSouth to explain the discrepancy in figures given by the Bank. Mr. Green assured me that he would look into the matter and get back to me. The next we heard from AmSouth Bank, however, was when my father, the Defendant, was served a summons on December 30, 1999, 4:30 p.m. When I returned to work on January 5, 2000, I found a phone message from a Carol McCoy of AmSouth, that had been left at 2:17 p.m. on December 30, 1999.
Around early 1999, Petitioner AmSouth’s Bob Green is the same one in whom the Defendant, my father, confided that he planned to sue the Bank just as soon as he could obtain legal representation, whereupon Mr. Green inquired when that would be. My father responded that he did not know, whereupon, possibly two months or so later, AmSouth initiated a lawsuit against my father, thus beating him to the punch, and taking unconscionable advantage of his having been long-since disfranchised in the legal arena by the State of Florida, which stems from Judge William R. Webb, who as well as the State of Florida, bears the responsibility for that having happened.
Our posture remains that the State of Florida has no jurisdiction to rule on any matter pertaining to the Robert F. Blevins and Ruth E. Blevins family, whose members all reside in Pasco County, Florida. This AmSouth Bank – Solomon and Benedict, P.A., matter must be tried in federal court, civilly and criminally.
Finally, it should be noted that Petitioner AmSouth Bank’s first foreclosure suit, CA99-2172-CA-J2, was dismissed with prejudice, and that this present case, CA99-8294CA / J3, is AmSouth’s second foreclosure attempt in less than a year against Defendant Robert F. Blevins.
If a hearing is to be held on March 15, 2000, I plan to be there in person, unless, of course, my father can obtain more qualified representation, in which case I may or may not be there. I thank the Court.
Sincerely,
Kimberly A. Blevins
V00-022
Enclosures
Cc: Robert F. Blevins
Jed Pittman, Clerk of Courts
Heather A. Pigman, Solomon and Benedict, P.A.
