|
|
Subversion of the Free Press to Hide Crime & Corruption or Conceal Facts is Wrong Remote Sensing Proves What is Happening on Earth and in Space Politicians Denying Facts Will Not Be Tolerated Here Our Position on Iraq Proves Our Impartiality We used over 5000 Images as Proof  Subversion of the free press to hide crime and to lie about facts is the source of the term The Liberal Media. This term was coined and first used by convicted felon Vice President Spiro Agnew who regularly denounced news outlets that were correctly and accurately reporting and therefore offending the criminal and corrupt Nixon administration that sought to hide the crimes that they did commit in the autumn of 1969. Agnew was sentenced to prison and disbarred from practicing law. Right-wing political pundits and fundamental Christians still use the example and lies of this convicted felon and the tactics of Impeached and disgraced President Nixon to cover up anything that do and deny it. All analysis of this claim of media bias typically prove it that it does not exist. Media typically do take sides. No one are surprised by this. The Press are Free to do so in the USA. It is the right of the press to be free in the USA. Freedom of the Press included expression, artistic and otherwise, that is specifically governed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. One website specifically deals with this amendment and there are over five million others. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Agnew, who was convicted of bribery was known for attacking his opponents with unusual turns of phrase. Among his most famous were "nattering nabobs of negativism", which his speechwriter William Safire claims to have written, and "effete corps of impudent snobs". Both expressions refer to the press corps. Agnew is also generally credited with the term "radiclib", an abbreviation of "radical liberal". This term notably surfaced in the Watergate scandal, in White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman's September 12, 1970 notes on a plot by Nixon to create "a front that sounds like Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) to support the Democratic candidates and praise their liberal records, etc., publicize their 'bad' quotes in guise of praise. Give the senators a 'radiclib' rating." On October 10, 1973, Agnew became the second Vice President to resign the office. Agnew resigned after pleading nolo contendere (no contest) to a criminal charge of tax evasion, part of a scheme where he allegedly accepted $29,500 in bribes during his tenure as governor of Maryland. Agnew was fined $10,000 and put on three years' probation. The University of Maryland, College Park is the repository for all things about Spiro Agnew. For an overview, point your browser to Maryland's Newsdesk site for journalists. FOOTNOTE A similar but much less used term is credited to US Senator Hillary Clinton. She said that a "The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" originated. She made a speech and she proclaimed the existence of a “vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband.” She referred to Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who dredged up the Lewinsky affair after failing to make charges related to the Whitewater real estate investment and other matters stick, as a “politically motivated prosecutor who is allied with right-wing opponents of my husband.” "The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" label backfired and millions of Republican Activists have webrings and sites that use her term where they openly (and not covertly) oppose anything Democrats do or say when the fact is that both are nearly identical. Ralph Nader and many others argue that Republicans and Democrats are identical, that they are both in the pockets of corporations. That is 100% true: the influence of money is pervasive in the US political system. Americans all accept that or it would not be so. Campaign finance issues indicate this. WHAT is OUR POSITION and WHERE DO WE STAND? Retired Professor and US citizen William J. Hart of Lagunillas Edif 5 Pedregosa, Merida, Merida, Venezuela 5101 is the founder of this website and the webmaster here. I am responsible for everything on this website. No "buck passing" exists here. I am a Libertarian. There are almost two million articles on the Internet about Libertarians. The Libertarian Political Party has a website. Quite a few recipients of the Nobel Prize have been Libertarians, including economist Milton Friedman who won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1976, "for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy." Defining, recognizing, and limiting bias is my job as webmaster at my science, history, medicine, and social science groups representing the Arts and Sciences at MSN. This job as webmaster requires my strength at research, understanding and revealing point-of-view. It is my personal position to avoid politicizing and personalizing anything at all in the tradition of science. This effort lends credibility to what I write and publish and gives what I write or allow to be written and presented at my web groups. This effort also gives a concrete direction as well as a sense of reliability and validity. My personality is always involved in representing facts. It is a clear cut personal choice to do so. That choice is to represent the scientific method in all cases. It is impossible, illogical, and irrational not to be involved to believe that others are not always involved. Not politicizing things includes identifying the political system that causes political dialogues and questions to remain objective.
|
|
