MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Language  |  Help  
 
The road sign chamber of horrorsTheroadsignchamberofhorrors@groups.msn.com 
  
What's New
  Join Now
  Message Board  
  Pictures  
  "At any time" signs to be abolished  
  The 'Not-on-a-wall" paradox  
  
  Councillors crib sheet  
  permanent revolution?  
  Gantry Signs  
  Signs as hazards  
  Vestigial Posts  
  Usability  
  Twenty is plenty  
  The "Is anyone looking" paradox  
  New eyes required?  
  Kingston upon Thames tour  
  Some successes?  
  
  
  Tools  
 

The not-on-a-wall paradox

The statutory utilities place signs describing the location of their apparatus in a highway on adjacent walls. The fire brigade does the same to show the location of their hydrants.  However local authorities as a matter of course erect poles in the footpath to carry information about waiting restrictions.  The question is "Why should there be a difference?"  It cannot be that signs on the wall are difficult to see.  After all, the most urgent and important sign of this type must be the fire hydrant sign. I think that it is a matter of habit and convenience for the highway authority.  It is easier to erect a post on 'highway authority land' than ask the frontager for permission to fix the sign on their wall or fence. Here are four examples of what I mean.

Councillors may need to convince their officers that a scheme is necessary and some points that they should bear in mind are here.

I would like to develop here the argument to place signs on frontages where possible.

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
    MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Search
Feedback  |  Help  
  ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  Legal  Advertise  MSN Privacy