MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Language  |  Help  
 
Truth Seekers MidlandsTruthSeekersMidlands@groups.msn.com 
  
What's New
  Join Now
  Web Page  
  TSM Rules  
  Main Site  
  Aliens  
  Alien Abductions  
  Alien Implants  
  Alien Footage  
  Area 51  
  Bermuda Triangle  
  Black Projects  
  Case Files  
  Cattle Mutilation  
  Close Encounters  
  Crop Circles  
  Cosmological Argument  
  Documents  
  EVP Recordings  
  Ghosts  
  Ghost Footage  
  Ghost Cams  
  Human Mutilation  
  Investigations  
  Jersey Devil  
  Loch Ness Monster  
  Magick & Witchcraft  
  Mars  
  Men in Black  
  MJ - 12  
  Mothman  
  News Archives  
  NASA Frequencies  
  Orbs  
  Ouija Boards  
  Paranormal Terms  
  Paranormal Dreaming  
  Pictures  
  Poltergeists  
  Philadelphia Experiment  
  Planets Found  
  Roswell  
  Science and the paranormal  
  S.E.T.I  
  Space News  
  Sightings Database  
  Sightings  
  Sightings Board  
  Ufo`s  
  Ufo`s in the News  
  UFO Footage  
  Historic UFO`s  
  Signs of a Haunting  
  Famous Hauntings  
  Messages  
  Sign our Guest Book  
  Poll  
  Personal Encounters  
  Links  
  Top Sites  
  Members Board  
  Members Profile  
  Members Sites  
  Downloads  
  Make Contact  
  Contact us  
  Your Feedback  
  TSM T-Shirts  
  Your Web Page  
  
  
  Tools  
 

The Cosmological Argument

Thomas Aquinas

 

     The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist.  It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things.  This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God.
     The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically represented below.

Cosmological Argument

  1. Things exist.
  2. It is possible for those things to not exist.
  3. Whatever has the possibility of non existence, yet exists, has been caused to exist.
    1. Something cannot bring itself into existence since it must exist to bring itself into existence which is illogical.
  4. There cannot be an infinite number of causes to bring something into existence.
    1. Because an infinite regression of causes ultimately has no initial cause which means there is no cause of existence.
    2. Since the universe exists, it must have a cause.
  5. Therefore, there must be an uncaused cause of all things.
  6. The uncaused cause must be God.

     Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274) had a version of the Cosmological Argument called the Argument from Motion.  He stated that things in motion could not have brought themselves into motion but must be caused to move.  There cannot be an infinite regression of movers.  Therefore, there must be an Unmoved Mover.  This Unmoved Mover is God.

Strengths of the argument

     The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity and easily comprehensible concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event.  Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and training in terms and concepts, but this argument is basic and simple.  Also, it is perfectly logical to assert that objects do not bring themselves into existence and must, therefore, have causes.

Weaknesses of the argument

     One of the weaknesses of the argument is that if all things need a cause to exist, then God Himself must also, by definition, need a cause to exist.  But this only pushes causation back and implies that there must be an infinite number of causes which cannot be.  This is paradoxical.  
     Also, by definition, God is uncaused.  

 

Courtesy of http://www.carm.org/apologetics/cosmological.htm

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
    MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Search
Feedback  |  Help  
  ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  Legal  Advertise  MSN Privacy