Exxon has been successful in taking OFF the table, the workers who worked with their experimental cleanup chemicals
No, I'm not talking about the accident itself or anything about that.
I'm talking about choices made by Exxon for cleanup chemicals.
Why theyu chose a bad product? (They had a financial interest in the patent they purchased for French inipol)
It affected more than the 1,000 young men in their 'experiment' using Inipol EAP 22.
I shared this by teleconference on 11/8 meeting, but didn't think it mattered to say more
ASK for a medical assist fund ... many injured have not been able to do steady work
Ask for a medical review of your medical info ... & see if 2 others who worked the oil spill look similar:
Exxon expert admits to harming people ... even in their own article ></SCRIPT>
Isn't our human resource our most valuable resource?
What was the gist of 11-14-06?
Does Exxon own your newspaper, by the way?
Someone thought there was an ownership change in about 1990
