MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Language  |  Help  
 
Renal LiverrenalLiver@groups.msn.com 
  
What's New
  Join Now
  late birth defects  
  Messages  
  Links  
  FLU  
  immune system  
  Kidney Terms  
  CFIDS, CFS, FM  
  Vets + Disability  
  CLL  
  Renal tests  
  Ovary - a Tumor  
  Reproductive harm  
  Pictures  
  ALS david  
  new view  
  HELLP Syndrome  
  F-16 crashes  
  blood clots  
  all this  
  Skeptical? @ ALS  
  ALS diagnosis  
  Crohn's, IBS, Colitis  
  Eyesight  
  Mental Health  
  CPK high  
  Periodontal Disease  
  Teeth  
  Zola Levitt dies  
  for Doctors  
  Vietnam Vets  
  Sect has flu  
  What is Needful  
  Hank Williams, Sr  
  Mystery Diagnosis  
  Cushing's Forum  
  not without  
  Crack the Case  
  Good nutrition  
  Asthma Risk  
  Ann shares  
  ALL or AIHA + NHL?  
  Body Temp  
  jaundice and  
  Death after 'flu'  
  fatty lumps  
  Hands cold  
  Hypotension?  
  Renal Failure  
  Cancer? No chemo  
  Recall a FLU?  
  Brain Tumors?  
  The Pattern  
  Fall Guy  
  TSH thyroid  
  Not Suspected  
  
  
  Tools  
 
These Issues?     Dear Maggie:
"Vietnam vets only got 1/2 of the disability approvals they should have had. Korean vets should have had the same, plus the others they did get approved. Gulf war vets have no Presumptive list , sadly; not even ALS which they have higher incidence of (most exposure to 2-butoxyethanol is what I think)"


by DaveBarker:
ALS can be related to Persian Gulf War veterans. The very first service connected ALS case approved was one of my clients. We won the case in an appeal in an in person BVA hearing.

Korean veterans who were exposed to herbicides are given the same consideation as those in Vietnam. Herbicide use in Korea was limited to a short period 1967-69 and in the DMZ area.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. However service connection of exposure to a disease is more than just opinion. The condition must be scientifically linked to exposure and the studies must be strong enough to convince the politicians to approve the scientific results. That is not easy to do.
I have been working on Agent Orange (and other chemical) issues since 1977. Many thousands of veterans have been interviewed by me (as their service officer) when they applied for compensation. In 1983 my Agent Orange articles began to be published. After a few years they were formed into a book which has been revised many times. The first several chapters have not seen modification, however chapters were added as needed.
My work uses several sources, including the National Academy of Sciences book "VETERANS AND AGENT ORANGE" as well as the UPDATES which have been about every 2 years.
The problem is the acceptance of science by the politicians. After the scientists and physicians give their opinions, the results are then reviewed by VA lawyers. Their opinions are then reviewed and either accepted, or rejected by the political administration in power at the time.

______________________________________

Dear Maggie:

Doctors for WWII vets are really stumped, because they want to look in the direction of Agent Orange for the ailments these came down with ... & of course it is not a choice for them.

Congratulations on helping your ALS 'gulf war syndrome' vet for getting disability approved. Must have been very hard to appear in person with that aillment ...

Sadly, it is not a presumptively approved disability for this group ... even with the 'stand out' harm in that category ... or in any of the 'higher incidences' reported by this group.

I still contend that the common chemical of harm for the 30s - present day is 2-butoxyethanol ... and a stronger version of it probably from the male tanks of WWI & other war periods.

For those who will look at the bigger picture, the pattern is there in all these groups. Simply put, you are looking for the CFIDS biomarkers, and doctors, to date, do not know what the fatigue is (AIHA or approaching AIHA is what this chemical would cause - New term is Immune Mediated Hemolytic Anemia)

Too bad Korean Vets' disability approval is limited to any times they were around Dioxin. I noticed that. The list, I firmly believe, is unfairly limited. It should be expanded.

Why do our health-damaged soldiers have to fight so? I think it is a blight on our Nation.

Approve them all, that's what I think!

How hard is this for the ailments that show up during service: they were healthy before they entered; not well during their service? These, at the very least, should be easily approved.

For others, they will definitely remember a serious FLU, or multilple bouts of diarrhea and flu-like symptoms. I did a 'chemical profile' regarding possible exposure to this chemical for one of our Citizens a few months ago. I suspect his being in Korea was one of them.
Our Jeff

Today's soldier says, "I need help"

As to 'gulf war syndrome'

Why I think the USA can't find the real cause


I'm just a nobody who
stumbled onto the fatigue of CFIDS ... & want to do my part to help my country & the service people who have fought for our freedom


Help your doctors out, but giving them a little more info

What's different on my opinion, is that it is based on recognizing the signs of 2-butoxyethanol poisoning. Spent 4 years on it. Recognize it. Not unlike the NASA man did in his field one day. 

These Issues?  should be the presumptive list for everyone in military service + MORE

Korean Vets Presumptive Approvals   *

____________________________________

Thanks Maggie a big A&W Root Beer     DaveBarker

Children of Vietnam War Veterans Affected by Agent Orange

http://forums.military.com/eve/forums?a=tpc&s=78919038&f=739197221&m=6331984331&r=1930091890001#1930091890001

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
  Try MSN Internet Software for FREE!
    MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail  |  Search
Feedback  |  Help  
  ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  Legal  Advertise  MSN Privacy